Answer by mergeconflict for Is it possible to define type with callable...
It's good that you're familiar with the C++"function object" concept, because that's a good introduction to Haskell's idea of what you can do with plain old functions... Specifically, currying, partial...
View ArticleAnswer by hugomg for Is it possible to define type with callable objects in...
Yes, in Haskell you can't have callable objects as that would mess up type-inference a lot. You will have to give explicit names to your functions, just like in OO languages that don't support __call__...
View ArticleAnswer by Adam Wagner for Is it possible to define type with callable objects...
I may get my terminology wrong here, as I am no Haskell veteran myself. However, from my understanding of Haskell:As Haskell is not object-oriented, it does not have objects or instances (in the...
View ArticleIs it possible to define type with callable objects in Haskell?
I'm quite new to haskell and not too comfortable with it's type system yet. And I wondering, if there is ability to define the type (datatype?), which instances can be called as functions?Analogues are...
View Article
